Frequently Asked Questions

Open Agreements is an open-source CLI and library for filling standard legal agreement templates (DOCX) with structured inputs. It is designed to work directly with coding agents across hosted and local workflows.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

In local package mode, template fill runs on your machine and writes local files. If you use the hosted connector at https://openagreements.org/api/mcp, request/response content passes through that hosted service.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

The project includes internal templates (Common Paper, Bonterms, and employment packs), external vendored templates (YC SAFEs), and recipe-driven templates (NVCA Series A documents) downloaded from official sources at runtime. Browse the full catalog at /templates.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

Yes. The recommended path is Claude Code (the CLI): claude mcp add --transport http open-agreements https://openagreements.org/api/mcp. You can also add the same URL as a connector in Claude.ai (Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector) to list templates and fill agreements directly from the chat.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

Licensing is enforced by template metadata and validation rules. Non-derivative sources are kept unchanged, and non-redistributable sources are handled through recipe instructions and runtime download.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

Yes. Open Agreements can generate editable .docx agreements from template inputs, including Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) and Cloud Services Agreements (CSAs), with workflow options for hosted connector use or local package execution.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

Yes. Open Agreements is built for agent-assisted contract drafting from structured prompts and form inputs. Startup teams can generate first-pass agreements in .docx, then review and negotiate them with counsel.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

Public trust signals include passing CI checks, Codecov coverage with patch/project gates, Vitest-based test runs, and scenario-to-test traceability checks that map canonical scenarios to executable tests.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

Yes. Open Agreements includes employment templates for offer letters, IP/inventions assignments, and confidentiality acknowledgements. The fill pipeline can also generate a jurisdiction-aware employment memo with compliance notes and disclaimers.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

No. Open Agreements automates document assembly and workflow structure. Teams should still involve qualified legal counsel for legal advice, negotiation strategy, and jurisdiction-specific interpretation.

Last verified: May 1, 2026

safe-docx is an open-source MCP server for editing existing Microsoft Word .docx files. AI coding agents like Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Codex call it to make formatting-preserving edits — replace text, add comments, update footnotes, compare versions, and produce tracked-changes redlines. Source on <a href="https://github.com/UseJunior/safe-docx">GitHub</a>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

python-docx is a Python building-block library (released 2013) for generating new Word documents programmatically. safe-docx is an MCP tool focused on editing documents you already have, with formatting preservation and document comparison built in. python-docx has no tracked-changes/redline support; safe-docx ships it as a primary tool. See the <a href="/comparisons/safe-docx-vs-python-docx.html">full comparison</a>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

docx (npm) is a declarative library for generating documents from scratch — useful when you're building reports or proposals programmatically. safe-docx is the inverse: it edits existing documents in place and preserves their formatting, with native tools for comments, footnotes, and version comparison. They are complementary, not substitutes. See the <a href="/comparisons/safe-docx-vs-docx.html">full comparison</a>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

Three reasons: (1) Platform independence — safe-docx works with Claude, Gemini, Codex, Goose, and any MCP-compatible agent. (2) Self-contained edit operations — every safe-docx call produces valid .docx output, so there's no risk of half-applied markup when context windows fill up. (3) Consistent behavior — same approach every time, regardless of how the model is feeling. See the <a href="/comparisons/safe-docx-vs-claude-file-editing.html">full comparison</a>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

Aspose.Words is a comprehensive commercial document SDK with broad format support and per-seat licensing. safe-docx is open source (MIT), free for any use, and purpose-built for AI coding agents to call as MCP tools. If you need server-side rendering or advanced features like programmatic TOC generation, Aspose has more surface area. If you just need agents to edit Word documents reliably, safe-docx ships that out of the box. See the <a href="/comparisons/safe-docx-vs-aspose-words.html">full comparison</a>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

SuperDoc is a full WYSIWYG browser editor with real-time collaboration — best when you want a visual editing experience. safe-docx is a headless MCP server for AI agents — best when you want agents to perform surgical edits on documents you already have. SuperDoc has native real-time tracked-changes editing; safe-docx has tooling to <em>generate</em> tracked-changes output by comparing two versions. See the <a href="/comparisons/safe-docx-vs-superdoc.html">full comparison</a>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

No. safe-docx is focused on editing existing .docx files. For greenfield document generation (e.g., building a report from a template) use a tool like docx (npm) or python-docx. For filling structured legal templates, use <a href="/products/open-agreements/">Open Agreements</a>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

Yes. Edits inherit formatting from the surrounding document context automatically — styles, numbering, headers, list levels are preserved without any manual configuration. This is the main reason it exists as a separate tool: naive edits to .docx XML often break formatting in ways that show up only when the document is opened in Word.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

Yes. safe-docx can compare two .docx versions and emit a tracked-changes document — the standard redline format lawyers use to review edits. Tracked changes are visible in Microsoft Word and survive round-trips through other Office editors.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

Any agent that supports MCP (Model Context Protocol). That includes Claude Code, Gemini CLI, ChatGPT Codex, Goose, and any custom MCP host. Install with: <code>claude mcp add safe-docx -- npx -y @usejunior/safe-docx</code>.

Last verified: May 2, 2026

Forward your contract, term sheet, or legal document to UseJunior by email. Within minutes, you receive a clause-by-clause analysis with citations back to the source text — directly in your inbox. No software to install, no logins to manage.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Email your document to UseJunior with a brief instruction (e.g., 'Review this NDA against our standard terms'). UseJunior analyzes the document and replies with a structured breakdown — flagging deviations, missing clauses, and risk areas with direct citations to the source text.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

No. UseJunior is email-native. You send documents by email and receive analysis back in your inbox. It works with any email client — Outlook, Gmail, Apple Mail — on desktop or mobile.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

UseJunior reviews contracts, NDAs, vendor agreements, term sheets, stock purchase agreements, lease agreements, insurance policies, subcontractor agreements, and other legal documents. We support PDF, Word (.docx), and common document formats.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Most reviews are returned within minutes. In one anonymized demonstration, UseJunior prepared an initial stock purchase agreement mark-up draft in 25 minutes. A supervising attorney then reviewed, revised, and approved the draft before it was sent. For context, legal teams may budget around 15 hours for first-pass SPA mark-up prep depending on deal complexity.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. Send both document versions to UseJunior and receive a summary of meaningful differences — highlighting what changed, what was added, and what was removed, with citations to both documents.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. Forward both the contract and the term sheet. UseJunior verifies whether the contract accurately reflects the agreed terms and flags any discrepancies or missing provisions.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. You can provide your organization's preferred contract positions and review standards. UseJunior reviews incoming documents against your playbook and flags any deviations from your accepted terms. All plans include up to 6 custom playbooks.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. UseJunior produces clean copy with redline markups showing suggested changes — currently in production and used by legal teams for contract negotiation.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

No. UseJunior accelerates the review process by surfacing issues, flagging deviations, and providing citations. It supports — not replaces — the judgment of your legal counsel. We recommend using UseJunior's analysis as a starting point for informed discussions with your attorney.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. Since UseJunior is email-based, it works on any device that can send and receive email — including phones and tablets. No app download required.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

UseJunior uses large language models (LLMs) applied specifically to legal document analysis. Our system is designed to provide citation-backed responses — every finding references the exact clause in your document so you can verify it yourself.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

With email-based tools, there is virtually no setup required. UseJunior works through your existing email — team members simply forward documents and receive analysis in their inbox. There is no software installation, no training required, and the first 3 reviews are free.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. Email-based AI contract review works on any device that sends email. With UseJunior, you can forward a contract from your phone and receive the analysis right back in your inbox — no app download or portal login needed.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Look for tools that provide clause-level citations with every finding. UseJunior references the exact contract language for each issue it identifies, so you can quickly cross-check the analysis against the original document and confirm the results yourself.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. AI contract review tools can identify leverage points, flag one-sided terms, and highlight deviations from market standards before you enter a negotiation. UseJunior's analysis includes citations to specific clauses, giving you a structured basis for requesting changes.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. UseJunior is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certified. Documents are encrypted at rest and in transit, with strict access controls and audit-ready practices designed for handling sensitive legal documents.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

No. Your documents are never used to train AI models. We use your data solely to provide the document review service you requested.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Data is stored in secure cloud infrastructure with industry-standard encryption. We maintain controls that meet SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 requirements. Each customer's data is logically isolated.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. You can request deletion of your data at any time through our support channels. Document retention follows your subscription settings.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Reputable AI contract review tools carry enterprise-grade security certifications. UseJunior is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certified, encrypts documents at rest and in transit, logically isolates each customer's data, and never uses documents to train AI models.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

UseJunior offers three tiers: Starter ($250/mo for 5 documents), Professional ($500/mo for 15 documents), and Enterprise (custom pricing for unlimited documents). All plans include unlimited users, unlimited re-reviews, and up to 6 custom playbooks. Your first 3 contract reviews are free.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. You can try UseJunior free with your first 3 contract reviews — no credit card required. This lets you experience the full workflow before choosing a plan.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

AI contract review can significantly reduce first-pass mark-up prep time for routine documents. In one anonymized UseJunior demonstration, the initial stock purchase agreement mark-up draft was prepared in 25 minutes. Attorney review, revision, and approval then occurred before the document was sent externally.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. By handling initial review and analysis, AI tools reduce the hours your attorney spends on routine document review. UseJunior customers use AI-generated analysis to have shorter, more focused conversations with legal counsel — saving billable time on both sides.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Pricing varies by provider and volume. UseJunior offers plans starting at $250/month for 5 documents, with all plans including unlimited users and re-reviews. The first 3 contract reviews are free with no credit card required, so you can evaluate the service before committing.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

The ROI depends on your contract volume and current review costs, but even a single flagged clause can prevent losses far exceeding the subscription cost. UseJunior's Starter plan costs $250/month — less than a single hour of most attorneys' time — and covers 5 document reviews with unlimited re-reviews.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

UseJunior works across document-heavy industries including small businesses, construction, insurance, real estate, healthcare administration, and arbitration. Any business that regularly reviews contracts or legal documents can benefit.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Absolutely. UseJunior is designed to be simple enough for non-lawyers. Small business owners use it to review vendor contracts, lease agreements, and insurance policies — then share UseJunior's analysis with their attorney for more informed, efficient consultations.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Construction contracts carry unique risks around scope changes, payment terms, delay penalties, and indemnification. UseJunior reviews construction contracts — including subcontractor agreements and change orders — by email, flagging risk areas with citations to the specific contract language.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Real estate professionals forward lease documents to AI review tools to quickly identify non-standard provisions, compare terms across properties, and flag deviations from preferred positions. UseJunior handles lease reviews by email, delivering a structured analysis with clause-level citations that teams can act on immediately.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. AI contract review tools analyze policy language, compare coverage terms across documents, and flag unusual exclusions or limitations. UseJunior processes insurance policy reviews by email and returns findings with direct citations to the policy text.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Yes. AI contract review tools can analyze vendor agreements, service contracts, and administrative agreements common in healthcare. UseJunior reviews these documents by email with the same SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 security standards that regulated industries require.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Small businesses can use AI contract review tools to get professional-grade analysis before consulting an attorney. UseJunior lets you forward any contract by email and receive a structured review with flagged risks and citations — so when you do consult your lawyer, the conversation is faster and more focused.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Email-based AI contract review is one of the fastest options for most businesses. With UseJunior, you forward the contract and receive a clause-by-clause analysis within minutes. In one anonymized demonstration, UseJunior prepared an initial stock purchase agreement mark-up draft in 25 minutes, followed by attorney review and approval before external use.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

AI contract review tools can flag one-sided provisions, unusual liability terms, and deviations from market standards. UseJunior identifies these issues and cites the exact clauses, so you can see the problematic language yourself before signing.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Key areas include rent escalation clauses, maintenance responsibilities, early termination penalties, personal guarantee requirements, and insurance obligations. UseJunior can review a commercial lease by email and flag all of these — plus any non-standard provisions — with references to the specific lease language.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Even a few contracts per year can carry significant risk — a single unfavorable clause in a lease or vendor agreement can cost thousands. UseJunior's Starter plan covers 5 documents per month at $250/mo, and the first 3 reviews are free so you can evaluate the value before committing.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Focus on scope of work clarity, payment terms, indemnification language, insurance requirements, and dispute resolution provisions. UseJunior reviews subcontractor agreements by email and flags risk areas with direct citations, giving you a clear picture of exposure before you sign.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Modern AI contract review tools are trained to recognize legal terminology, clause structures, and common contract provisions. UseJunior provides clause-level citations for every finding, so you can verify each result against the source text rather than taking the AI at face value.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Prioritize citation-backed analysis, enterprise security certifications like SOC 2 Type II, support for your document types, and a workflow that fits your team. UseJunior meets all of these criteria and works entirely through email, so there is no new software to learn.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

General-purpose chatbots can miss legal nuances, lack clause-level citations, and may not flag deviations from industry standards. Purpose-built tools like UseJunior are designed specifically for legal document analysis, providing structured findings with references to exact contract language.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

AI contract review tools are making professional-grade analysis accessible to businesses that cannot afford dedicated legal teams. With UseJunior, a small business owner can forward a contract by email and receive a detailed, citation-backed analysis in minutes — turning what used to require hours of attorney time into a quick email exchange.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

The best AI contract review tools provide citation-backed analysis you can verify against the original document. UseJunior references specific clauses in every finding so you can confirm the analysis yourself. It is designed to support — not replace — your legal counsel's judgment.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Portal-based tools require you to log into a new platform, upload documents, and learn a new interface. Email-based tools like UseJunior work within your existing inbox — forward a document, get analysis back by email. There is no software to install and no learning curve for your team.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

AI contract review is faster and less expensive for routine analysis, while attorneys provide judgment, negotiation strategy, and accountability. Many UseJunior customers use AI review as a first pass — receiving a structured analysis in minutes — then share it with their attorney for more focused, efficient consultations.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Templates give you a starting point for drafting, but they cannot analyze a contract you received from a counterparty. UseJunior reviews incoming documents clause by clause and flags deviations from standard terms — something a template cannot do.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

Purpose-built tools are designed for legal document structure, terminology, and risk patterns. UseJunior provides clause-level citations, supports custom playbooks, outputs Word documents with tracked changes, and holds SOC 2 Type II certification — capabilities that general AI assistants do not offer.

Last verified: February 10, 2026

No. The best AI contract review tools are designed for business professionals, not just lawyers. UseJunior delivers analysis in clear language with direct citations, so anyone reviewing a contract can understand the findings and share them with legal counsel.

Last verified: February 10, 2026